All or nothing?, corollary of MP philosophy
作者:gwnn   发布时间:2007-02-08 13:23:03   浏览次数:181

MP scoring, I'm defending,
...can you mathematically determine (even roughly) whether beating it, as opposed to taking what's ours, will give us more MP's?
Or is it just a matter of feeling?
Or is feeling a sort of experts' intrinsic math engine working?

By awn;
"Of course it's situational, but one thing to do is try to evaluate how normal the contract is. If the contract is unusual you generally need to beat it -- if your opponents are the only pair in game then if they make you'll get a zero regardless of whether you hold down the overtrick."

"If your opponents are the only pair to stop just short of game, then you'll always beat the pairs defending game making, so you may as well go all-out for the set and try to tie some of the pairs who set the game."

"If the contract seems very normal it's often a good result to hold them to just making (although again it always depends on the odds of setting). "

By brianshark:


The source & ...more details>>

I saw a statistic once, it's in my MP defense book (by Jim Priebe I think). It basically gives you a run-down of where your MPs are expected to come from in a typical session.

To get right to the point, he said that, on average, in a typical MP session (~24 bds => ~4% of the session's MPs per board):

- Each overtrick is worth 1% of the MPs for the session
- Each set is worth 2%






上一篇:中国菊科药用植物名录        下一篇:Noam Chomsky

本文评论

请填写详细信息发表评论

评论名字:
电子邮件:
评论内容:
验证字码:验证码

广告赞助商

边栏广告

Bigger the Ship,Longer the Travel,Thicker the Logs; cvl7163cf2485故知网站包括CMS、BBS和三个BLOG;详情可见“友情连接”;欢迎访问,欢迎指导。e-Mail: cf_John0@hotmail.com; cf_civill@126.com; cf_John0@mail2world.com